|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 14, 2004; 10.1105/tpc.104.024174 © 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Optimization and Evolution of Light Harvesting in Photosynthesis: The Role of Antenna Chlorophyll Conserved between Photosystem II and Photosystem IDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail svassili{at}brocku.ca; fax 905-688-1855.
The efficiency of oxygenic photosynthesis depends on the presence of core antenna chlorophyll closely associated with the photochemical reaction centers of both photosystem II (PSII) and photosystem I (PSI). Although the number and overall arrangement of these chlorophylls in PSII and PSI differ, structural comparison reveals a cluster of 26 conserved chlorophylls in nearly identical positions and orientations. To explore the role of these conserved chlorophylls within PSII and PSI we studied the influence of their orientation on the efficiency of photochemistry in computer simulations. We found that the native orientations of the conserved chlorophylls were not optimal for light harvesting in either photosystem. However, PSII and PSI each contain two highly orientationally optimized antenna chlorophylls, located close to their respective reaction centers, in positions unique to each photosystem. In both photosystems the orientation of these optimized bridging chlorophylls had a much larger impact on photochemical efficiency than the orientation of any of the conserved chlorophylls. The differential optimization of antenna chlorophyll is discussed in the context of competing selection pressures for the evolution of light harvesting in photosynthesis.
In photosynthetic systems a variable number of pigments act as light-harvesting antenna to absorb and direct solar energy to photochemical reaction centers (RC). The effectiveness of the RC depends on the efficient transfer of excitation energy from these antenna molecules.
All known RCs share a similar structural blueprint: two sets of five transmembrane helices holding six porphyrin and two quinone cofactors arranged in two membrane-spanning branches (Michel and Deisenhofer, 1988
RCs where electron transport terminates at iron sulfur centers are classified as Type I, and RCs whose terminal electron acceptors are quinones are Type II (Blankenship, 1992
Type II RCs are found in purple bacteria, green filamentous bacteria, and in the photosystem II (PSII) complex of oxygenic photosynthetic organisms. The Type II RC polypeptides responsible for holding the electron transport cofactors (denoted D1/D2 in PSII) are smaller than their counterparts in Type I RCs but have a strong homology with the first five membrane spanning helixes at the C-terminal end of the Type I RC polypeptides (Krauß et al., 1996
The number of core antenna pigments is variable between different types of reaction centers. In oxygenic organisms the PSII core antenna consists of
High-resolution atomic structures have been determined for PSI (Jordan et al., 2001
It is not known whether the PSI antenna structure has a similar motif to that found in PSII, where the orientations of some pigments are highly optimized for energy transfer and others are not. This question is particularly interesting because several residues that provide the fifth ligand to the Mg atom of the (bacterio)chlorophyll antenna molecules have been previously shown to be conserved over the course of evolution among a large group of photosynthetic organisms including green sulfur bacteria, heliobacteria, PSI, and PSII (Fyfe et al., 2002 These conserved chlorophylls represent significant fractions of the core antenna systems. Why have the positions and orientations of these chlorophylls been conserved? Are the conserved positions critical to energy transfer efficiency or do they reflect selection pressures related to assembly and/or maintenance of stable protein structure? To answer these questions we performed a detailed analysis of the optimality of the conserved chlorophyll arrangements. Our results show that the conserved antenna chlorophylls are not orientationally optimized to maximize quantum yield. By extending our analysis to each individual antenna chlorophyll in PSI and PSII we found that the native orientations of very few were actually optimized for quantum yield of photochemistry. Each photosystem did, however, contain a pair of highly optimized bridging chlorophylls responsible for carrying much of the excitation energy from the antenna to the RC.
Comparing PSII and PSI Antenna Structure According to a previous sequence alignment (Fyfe et al., 2002
When CP47 and PsaB were superimposed using the same fitting procedure described above, 13 equivalent chlorophylls were found (Table 1). In the case of CP47, seven chlorophyll ligands were the same as found previously by sequence alignment (Fyfe et al., 2002
We also aligned the D1/D2 domain of PSII with the RC core domain of PSI using a similar fitting procedure based on the two ChlZ/D and their PSI equivalents (Baymann et al., 2001 The rigid body fits of all three PSII domains to PSI were performed separately. Alignment of the entire PSII x-ray structure with PSI resulted in a poor overlap because of the larger distance between the antenna and the RC domains in PSII compared with PSI and the slightly different relative orientations of antenna and core domains of the two photosystems.
The independent alignment of the antenna and the RC domains of PSII with PSI that resulted from our rigid-body fits is shown in Figure 1 and a summary of our structural comparison is presented in Table 1. A total of 26 chlorophylls (not including reaction center chromophores) have very close structural equivalents in PSII and PSI. Twenty-four of these conserved chlorophylls are organized in two layers, one toward the stromal surface and the other toward the lumenal surface. The remaining two chlorophylls interconnect the two layers. We used PSII structures from both Thermosynechococcus elongatus (Jordan et al., 2001
Why are the positions and orientations of these 26 chlorophylls so highly conserved between PSII and PSI? One explanation is that the conserved arrangement is designed optimally for light harvesting and energy transfer to the RC. To address this hypothesis we compare the efficiency of the conserved antenna chlorophyll subsystems with randomly generated chlorophyll arrangements. For both PSI and PSII we generated an ensemble of models with alternate arrangements of the transition dipoles by random independent orientation of the antenna chlorophylls. Only the orientations of the dipoles varied, their positions, and thus the distances between them, were unchanged. We then assessed the quantum yield of photochemistry (as the yield of reduced quinone electron acceptors) of kinetic models for excitation energy transfer based on each of the resulting structural configurations. See Methods for more details. The results of simulations are represented as histograms of the yield distribution (Figures 2, 3, and 6). The number of scores in each histogram bin is equal to the number of models with alternate chlorophyll arrangements for which the quantum yield falls within the range of the bin. The histograms show the influence of the changing structural configurations on the calculated quantum yield and allow for easy comparison to the quantum yield of the native configuration. The quantum yield of the native configuration, shown by an arrow, divides the histogram into regions representing structural configurations with higher and lower quantum yields. The probability of attaining a quantum yield higher than the native configuration by chance is the number of structural configurations that predict a higher quantum yield (area under the histogram to the right of the native configuration) divided by all structural configurations tested (area of entire histogram).
Efficiency of the Conserved PSI/PSII Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll Subsystems To investigate the possible optimality of the conserved antenna chlorophylls we constructed model antenna systems for both PSII and PSI that contained only these antenna chlorophylls. In PSII, two of the conserved chlorophylls are the ChlZ/D molecules associated with the D1 and D2 reaction center proteins. These chlorophylls have been suggested to serve an alternative electron transport function in PSII, have previously been shown not to be oriented optimally for energy transfer (Depaula et al., 1985
Interestingly, when the complete antenna system of PSII was considered, and the orientations of all antenna chlorophylls (except the two ChlZ/D) were varied, the native configuration of the entire antenna was more optimized (Figure 2C) than that of the conserved subset (Figure 2A). The native orientation of the complete antenna system of PSI was also optimized more than the conserved subset, as shown in Figure 2D. The optimality of the entire PSI antenna has been observed previously (Sener et al., 2002 Two additional models were designed to further test for optimality of the conserved antenna chlorophylls within the entire energy transfer networks of PSII and PSI. These models included all antenna chlorophylls, but only the orientations of the 24 conserved chlorophylls were varied and all other chlorophylls remained fixed. Again, for both PSII and PSI the native arrangement of the conserved block of antenna chlorophylls was not optimal, even when considered within the complete antenna systems of PSII and PSI (data not shown; results very similar to Figures 2A and 2B). The orientations of the conserved antenna are thus not optimized for direct energy transfer to either RC or for facilitating energy transfer in the presence of the nonconserved chlorophylls unique to each photosystem.
Comparing the Efficiency of Other Photosynthetic Reaction Centers with Conserved Antenna
In Search of Optimized Sites
To examine the optimality of each individual chlorophyll we changed its orientation in a model where all other antenna chlorophylls were fixed in their native orientations and calculated the resulting quantum yield for each orientation. We then determined the probability (P) of occurrence of orientations that resulted in a higher quantum yield than that calculated for the native orientation. Thus, the smaller the value of P the more highly optimized the native orientation of that individual chlorophyll. Simultaneously, we recorded the best and the worst quantum yields that resulted from all sampled orientations of each chlorophyll. The difference between the best and the worst quantum yield (
Figure 4 shows plots of the dependence of
Figure 5 shows the dependence of P, the measure of orientational optimality, on ![]() for each chlorophyll in PSII and PSI. In PSII, chlorophylls 31 and 14 have the largest impact on quantum yield and are both found to be oriented optimally (Figure 6A). These two chlorophylls are the closest to the reaction center and do not have structural analogs in PSI. About half of the remaining chlorophylls show some degree of optimization whereas the other half do not, as expected for a random aggregate.
In PSI, the four chlorophylls that have the most impact on quantum yield show very different degrees of orientational optimization (Figure 5B). Chlorophylls A40 and B39 are not optimized whereas A26 and B24 are. None of these four chlorophylls have structural analogs in PSII, however, chlorophylls A26 and B24 in PSI appear to be functional analogs to chlorophylls 31 and 14 in PSII. Chlorophylls A40 and B39 are actually closer to the reaction center chromophores than they are to the antenna (Figure 4B) and may thus serve more than a light-harvesting role in PSI. Figure 5B shows no clear trend in the optimality of the less-potent antenna chlorophylls. About half of the remaining chlorophylls are optimized to some degree; the other half are not. This is true for antenna that do have structural analogs in PSII as well as for those that are unique to PSI. Even though the overall structure of the antenna system in PSII is different from PSI, some similar features are seen in the arrangement of optimized chlorophylls (Figures 4A and 5A). In PSII, two bridging antenna chlorophylls, chlorophyll 14 and chlorophyll 31, have the largest potential to affect the quantum yield, are unique to PSII, and are highly optimized. In PSI chlorophylls A26 and B24 also have a large potential to affect quantum yield, are unique to PSI, and are highly orientationally optimized. We conclude that both PSI and PSII antenna systems appear optimized as a whole only because of one pair of highly optimized bridging chlorophylls. To support this conclusion we calculated the distributions for the entire PSI and PSII antenna ensemble in which the orientations of all chlorophylls except the two optimized bridging chlorophylls were varied. These distributions are shown in Figure 6. It is clear that the orientations of the bulk chlorophylls in both PSI and PSII are not optimal. Interestingly, the pair of optimized chlorophylls is not conserved but is unique to each photosystem.
Beyond Orientation: The Effects of Spectral Composition In this article we have studied the orientational optimality of light harvesting. There are alternative ways to optimize energy transfer between antenna pigments. Changing the energy levels of antenna pigments to change the spectral overlap between the emission spectrum of the energy donor and the absorption spectrum of the energy acceptor will affect efficiency and directionality of energy transfer. The spectral characteristics of antenna chlorophyll are modified by both pigment-protein and pigment-pigment interactions. Unfortunately, it is not yet possible to determine if spectral overlap is optimal because there is very little experimental data on the actual distribution of spectral forms within the core antenna of PSI and PSII.
To determine whether the basic conclusions of our study are affected by spectral changes, we have tested the effects of energy level on the optimality of the two most important bridging chlorophylls in PSII and PSI by assigning their energy levels higher and lower than the rest of the antenna system. In PSII the energy levels of these two chlorophylls (C14 and C31) were adjusted by ±220 cm1. This energy difference exceeds the limits predicted for the strongest possible coupling for either of these two chlorophylls with their nearest neighbor pigment (177 cm1). We have found that placing the energy level of C31 higher decreased its degree of optimization from 0.026 to 0.044, whereas placing its energy level lower increased optimality to 0.008. Similar results were obtained for C14. In all cases these pigments remained highly optimized. In PSI the maximal possible coupling of A26 and B24 to their closest neighbors is stronger than in PSII (620 cm1). Analogous to the situation in PSII, both A26 and B24 remained optimized when their energy levels were changed by ±620 cm1. Furthermore, placing the energy levels of these pigments lower than the rest of the antenna system significantly increased their potential to affect quantum yield. Previous results from theoretical calculations performed with the PSI structure have suggested that these pigments are red-shifted (Damjanovic et al., 2002
Selection Pressures Affecting Core Antenna Structure The optimization of quantum yield is important predominantly under light-limiting conditions, when light absorption falls short of metabolic demand. Under these conditions any small increase in quantum yield would be directly translated as more usable energy to the organism, and in the absence of strong competing selection pressures, could be selected for. Under conditions where light absorption exceeds metabolic demand, other reactions that compete for the deactivation of excited chlorophyll molecules and protect the organism from photooxidative stress can be expected to be more critical factors in the evolution of antenna systems, particularly in oxygenic photosynthesis. For example, the quenching of reactive species by carotenoids is a major photoprotective mechanism that may serve as a competing selection pressure for the relative positions and orientation of both core antenna chlorophyll and carotenoid molecules. Other selection pressures that could potentially affect the orientation of core antenna chlorophyll include, the facilitation of energy transfer between reaction centers, the coupling of a variety of peripheral antenna (including both bilin and chlorophyll binding polypeptides) to the core antenna, and the effectiveness of energy-regulating mechanisms like state transitions and/or high-energy quenching. The core antenna of PSII and PSI face differing selection pressures. In the first instance, the two photosystems have very different strategies in core antenna organization, with the conserved block making up the majority of the core antenna in PSII but a much smaller part of the large ring of core antenna in PSI. The core antenna must also facilitate energy transfer between different peripheral antenna complexes in PSII and PSI. In addition, the two photosystems have different sensitivities to photooxidative damage and different regulatory and photoprotective strategies. Despite these differences the positions and orientations of the chlorophylls within the conserved block of pigments have remained remarkably unchanged during the independent evolution of PSII and PSI. What is the driving force for the conservation of the arrangement of this group of antenna pigments?
Structural considerations related to assembly and stability of the photosystems are a strong possibility. Clearly there are structural constraints that will limit the possible associations of porphyrins, especially the macrocycle, with the conserved system of transmembrane
Further work to understand the origin of this conservation will clearly require consideration of structural factors including the role played by the porphyrins in stabilizing the six membrane-spanning
We have shown that both photosystems have a unique pair of antenna chlorophylls close to the RC whose orientations affect quantum yield more than any other antenna chlorophylls and whose native orientations are found to be optimal for bridging energy transfer to the RC. Their presence may reflect a combination of increased selection pressure on these strategically located chlorophyll and some level of increased structural freedom in the area between the five-member
Kinetic models for excited-state dynamics were constructed based on the x-ray structures of PSI and PSII from Thermosynechococcus elongatus (Jordan et al., 2001 where denotes the probability that the quinone acceptor is reduced and is the total amount of excitation at time zero. Unimolecular decay rates were 0.5 ns1, the index of refraction was 1.5 (Gruszecki et al., 1999
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Discovery and Equipment grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Sergei Vasil'ev (svassili{at}brocku.ca.). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.104.024174. Received May 11, 2004; accepted August 26, 2004.
Barber, J., and Andersson, B. (1994). Revealing the blueprint of photosynthesis. Nature 370, 3134.[CrossRef] Baymann, D., Brugna, M., Muhlenhoff, U., and Nitschke, W. (2001). Daddy, where did (PS)I come from? Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1507, 291310.[Medline] Ben Shem, A., Frolow, F., and Nelson, N. (2003). Crystal structure of plant photosystem I. Nature 426, 630635.[CrossRef][Medline] Bibby, T.S., Nield, J., and Barber, J. (2001a). Iron deficiency induces the formation of an antenna ring around trimeric photosystem I in cyanobacteria. Nature 412, 743745.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bibby, T.S., Nield, J., Chen, M., Larkum, A.W.D., and Barber, J. (2003). Structure of a photosystem II supercomplex isolated from Prochloron didemni retaining its chlorophyll a/b light-harvesting system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 90509054. Bibby, T.S., Nield, J., Partensky, F., and Barber, J. (2001b). Oxyphotobacteria. Antenna ring around photosystem I. Nature 413, 590.[CrossRef][Medline] Blankenship, R.E. (1992). Origin and early evolution of photosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 33, 91111.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Byrdin, M., Jordan, P., Krauss, N., Fromme, P., Stehlik, D., and Schlodder, E. (2002). Light harvesting in photosystem I: Modeling based on the 2.5-angstrom structure of photosystem I from Synechococcus elongatus. Biophys. J. 83, 433457. Damjanovic, A., Vaswani, H.M., Fleming, G.R., and Fromme, P. (2002). Chlorophyll excitations in photosystem I as revealed by semi-empirical ZINDO/CIS calculations. Biophys. J. 82, 293 (abstr.). Depaula, J.C., Innes, J.B., and Brudvig, G.W. (1985). Electron-transfer in photosystem-II at cryogenic temperatures. Biochemistry 24, 81148120.[CrossRef][Medline] Faller, P., Rutherford, A.W., and Un, S. (2000). High-field EPR study of carotenoid(.+) and the angular orientation of chlorophyll z(.+) in photosystem II. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104, 1096010963.[CrossRef]
Ferreira, K.N., Iverson, T.M., Maghlaoui, K., Barber, J., and Iwata, S. (2004). Architecture of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving center. Science 303, 18311838. Fyfe, P.K., Jones, M.R., and Heathcote, P. (2002). Insights into the evolution of the antenna domains of type-I and type-II photosynthetic reaction centres through homology modelling. FEBS Lett. 530, 117123.[CrossRef][Medline] Gillie, J.K., Fearey, B.L., Hayes, J.M., Small, G.J., and Goldbeck, J.H. (1987). Persistent hole burning of the primary donor state of photosystem I: Strong linear electron-phonon coupling. Chem. Phys. Lett. 134, 316322.[CrossRef]
Gobets, B., van Stokkum, I.H.M., van Mourik, F., Dekker, J.P., and van Grondelle, R. (2003). Excitation wavelength dependence of the fluorescence kinetics in photosystem I particles from Synechocystis PCC 6803 and Synechococcus elongatus. Biophys. J. 85, 38833898. Gruszecki, W.I., Grudzinski, W., Banaszek-Glos, A., Matula, M., Kernen, P., Krupa, Z., and Sielewiesiuk, J. (1999). Xanthophyll pigments in light-harvesting complex II in monomolecular layers: localisation, energy transfer and orientation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1412, 173183.[Medline] Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K. (1996). VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 3338.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Jordan, P., Fromme, P., Witt, H.-T., Klukas, O., Saenger, W., and Krauß, N. (2001). Three-dimensional structure of cyanobacterial photosystem I at 2.5 Å resolution. Nature 411, 909917.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamiya, N., and Shen, J.-R. (2003). Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II from Thermosynechococcus vulcanus at 3.7-Å resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 98103.
Klukas, O., Schubert, W.-D., Jordan, P., Krauß, N., Fromme, P., Witt, H.-T., and Saenger, W. (1999). Photosytem I, an improved model of the stromal subunits PsaC, PsaD, and PsaE. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 73517360. Krauß, N., Schubert, W.-D., Klukas, O., Fromme, P., Witt, H.-T., and Saenger, W. (1996). Photosystem I at 4 Å resolution represents the first structural model of a joint photosynthetic reaction centre and core antenna system. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 965973.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Michel, H., and Deisenhofer, J. (1988). Relevance of the photosynthetic reaction center from purple bacteria to the structure of photosystem II. Biochemistry 27, 17. Nitschke, W., and Rutherford, A.W. (1991). Photosynthetic reaction centers: Variations on a common structural theme. Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 241245.[CrossRef][Medline] Rhee, K.H., Morris, E.P., Barber, J., and Kuhlbrandt, W. (1998). Three-dimensional structure of the plant photosystem II reaction centre at 8 Å resolution. Nature 396, 283286.[CrossRef][Medline] Saff, E., and Kuijlaars, A. (1997). Distributing many points on a sphere. Math. Intell. 19, 511. Schubert, W.-D., Klukas, O., Saenger, W., Witt, H.-T., Fromme, P., and Krauß, N. (1998). A common ancestor for oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthetic systems: A comparison based on the structural model pf photosystem I. J. Mol. Biol. 280, 297314.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Sener, M.K., Lu, D.Y., Ritz, T., Park, S., Fromme, P., and Schulten, K. (2002). Robustness and optimality of light harvesting in cyanobacterial photosystem I. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106, 79487960.[CrossRef] Smith, P.J., Peterson, S., Masters, V.M., Wydrzynski, T., Styring, S., Krausz, E., and Pace, R.J. (2002). Magneto-optical measurements of the pigments in fully active photosystem II core complexes from plants. Biochemistry 41, 19811989.[CrossRef][Medline] Vasil'ev, S., Brudvig, G.W., and Bruce, D. (2003). The X-ray structure of photosystem II reveals a novel electron transport pathway between P680, cytochrome b(559) and the energy-quenching cation, Chl(Z)(+). FEBS Lett. 543, 159163.[CrossRef][Medline] Vasil'ev, S., Lee, C.-I., Brudvig, G.W., and Bruce, D. (2002). Structure-base kinetic modeling of excited-state transfer and trapping in His-tagged PSII core complexes from Synechocystis. Biochemistry 40, 1223612243.
Vasil'ev, S., Orth, P., Zouni, A., Owens, T.G., and Bruce, D. (2001). Excited-state dynamics in photosystem II: Insights from the x-ray crystal structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 86028607. Vasil'ev, S., Shen, J.-R., Kamiya, N., and Bruce, D. (2004). The orientations of core antenna chlorophylls in photosystem II are optimized to maximize the quantum yield of photosynthesis. FEBS Lett. 561, 111116.[CrossRef][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | THE PLANT CELL | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | |
|---|---|---|---|