|
|
||||||||
|
Photosynthetic PigmentationVariegations on a ThemeHarry B. SmithPlant pigmentation has been of major interest to horticulturists for millennia. The ancient Egyptians, for example, cultivated the madder plant (Rubia tinctorum) as a source of dye for the ornamentation of mummies, and tribal peoples living before the Common Era in northern Britain tattooed their skin with indigo dye, a fact recorded by Julius Caesar upon Roman colonization of Britain. The diligence with which Native Americans cultivated many different pigmented maize seeds can even be ascribed to an early systematic foray into plant genetics. During the present century, the chemical industry has largely obviated the exploitation of plant pigmentation, but basic scientists have pursued studies of plant coloring to the extent that the disciplines of plant physiology, biochemistry, development, and genetics have all flourished and, on occasion, converged. Such convergence of experimental disciplines and approaches is perhaps not surprising given the fundamental roles that pigments play in plant life. Certainly one of the most important functions to be effected by plant pigments is the capturing of light energy for photosynthesis. Chief players in this regard are the green chlorophylls, as well as the orange-red carotenoids. Both of these pigment types reside within chloroplasts, which in turn arise from colorless, non-differentiated proplastids. The appearance of green, photosynthetic tissue from dark-grown (etiolated) seedlings can thus provide an excellent system for addressing a wide range of cell biological themes. As an example, the assembly of the photosynthetic apparatus along with the performance of the carbon reduction cycle within the chloroplast requires the coordinated expression of genes residing in the nuclear and plastid genomes. Exactly how the cell orchestrates signaling pathways between cellular compartments is an experimental issue that continues to benefit from studies of the light-induced synthesis of photosynthetic pigments. Mutations that interfere with the proper greening of etiolated plant tissue upon exposure to light, therefore, may provide crucial insight into intracellular signaling events. Because albino plants suitable for developmental investigation can be hard to come by, however, a number of plant mutants that elaborate a variegated phenotype have been selected for study over the past few decades. A number of factors can trigger leaf variegation. It is clear, for example, that light and other variable environmental cues can differentially affect organ and tissue pigmentation: shaded branches may become chlorotic, illuminated branches may produce vibrantly colored foliage. Thus, in addition to mutations that would directly interfere with chloroplast development (e.g., because they affect photosystem assembly), mutations that potentiate plant responsiveness and sensitivity to environmental effects could also provoke variegated phenotypes. Furthermore, inasmuch as both nuclear and chloroplast DNA encode proteins and stable RNAs essential to chloroplast function (the vast majority of chloroplast proteins are in fact nuclear encoded), chloroplast genesis could be affected by the appropriate mutation of either genome. Indeed, variegated mutants of both categories exist, whereby chloroplasts segregate during leaf development to give clones of cells containing varying amounts of affected as opposed to normal (i.e., green) chloroplasts.
In addition, mutations within the third source of genetic material in plant cells, the mitochondrion, have also been found to result in leaf variegation. Although the segregation of faulty mutant mitochondria, like that of mutant chloroplasts, represents a conceptually satisfying mechanism for variegation, the resulting mutant plants confront us with many questions and few answers. The nonchromosomal stripe (NCS) mutants of maize, for instance, as well as Arabidopsis mutations at the nuclear locus that, reasonably enough, was originally named chloroplast mutator (CHM), manifest maternally heritable mitochondrial DNA rearrangements that ultimately harm chloroplast structure and function ( Two papers in this issue of THE PLANT CELL report different investi-gative paths that have converged upon a variegated Arabidopsis mutant. On pages 4355, Wu et al. update their efforts in investigating the communication pathways between nuclear and organellar genomes, and offer insight into the biochemical lesion that underlies the variegated phenotype of the Arabidopsis immutans (im) mutant. On pages 5768, Carol et al. describe their success in further elucidating the biochemistry of plant pigment biosynthesis by isolating a variegated mutant of Arabidopsis that turns out to be an allele of IM. The experimental elegance displayed by each group will do much to further research into both the molecular biology and biochemistry of organelle development.
The variegated patterning of im is highly intriguing in that increases in either temperature or light intensity increase the amount of white-sectored plant tissue (
Rodermel's group has made important strides in characterizing im (
Biochemical characterization of the im plants extended to chlorophyll and carotenoid content (
Although PDS has been studied in a variety of species (reviewed in
Working across the Atlantic from Wu et al., Carol et al. crossed a line harboring a transposable element on chromosome 4 with a corresponding line carrying an Activator (Ac) tranposase so as to promote mutational rounds of Ac excision and reinsertion within the nuclear genome (
And the identity of the IM protein? Not homologous to PDS, nor to any other known chloroplast protein for that matter, the predicted 40.5-kD translation product of IM in fact shares homology in all searched databases solely to the alternative oxidase (AOX) of plant mitochondria. AOX provides plants with an alternative pathway for the shuttling of electrons from reduced ubiquinone (ubiquinol) of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (for a review see
Based on the conclusion that the IM protein acts as an oxidase to support phytoene turnover in carotenoid biosynthesis, both research groups offer a model to explain the elaboration of the light-induced white sectors seen in im. Carotenoids, in addition to being light-harvesting accessory molecules, protect tissues from photooxidative damage (
REFERENCES
Carol, P., Stevenson, D., Bisanz, C., Breitenbach, J., Sandmann, G., Mache, R., Coupland, G., and Kuntz, M. (1999) Mutations in the Arabidopsis gene IMMUTANS cause a variegated phenotype by inactivating a chloroplast terminal oxidase associated with phytoene desaturation. Plant Cell 11:57-68 Koncz, C., and Rédei, G.P. (1994). Genetic studies with Arabidopsis: A historical view. In Arabidopsis, E.M. Meyerowitz and C.R. Somerville, eds (Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), pp. 223252. Koornneef, M. (1987). Linkage map of Arabidopsis thaliana (2n = 10). In Genetic Maps, S.J. O'Brien, ed (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), pp. 742745. Norris, S.R., Barrette, T.R., and DellaPenna, D. (1995) Genetic dissection of carotenoid synthesis in Arabidopsis defines plastoquinone as an essential component of phytoene desaturation. Plant Cell 7:2139-2149[Abstract].
Rédei, G.P. (1963) Somatic instability caused by a cysteine-sensitive gene in Arabidopsis.. Science 139:767-769
Rédei, G.P. (1967) Biochemical aspects of a genetically determined variegation in Arabidopsis.. Genetics 56:431-443 Rédei, G.P. (1975) Arabidopsis as a genetic tool. Annu. Rev. Genet. 9:111-127[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. Röbbelen, G. (1968) Genbedingte Rotlicht-Empfindlichkeit der Chloroplastendifferenzierung bei Arabidopsis.. Planta 80:237-254[CrossRef][ISI].
Roussell, D.L., Thompson, D.L., Pallardy, S.G., Miles, D., and Newton, K.J. (1991) Chloroplast structure and function is al-tered in the NCS2 maize mitochondrial mutant. Plant Physiol. 96:232-238 Saisho, D., Nambara, E., Naito, S., Tsutsumi, N., Hirai, A., and Nakazono, M. (1997) Characterization of the gene family for al-ternative oxidase from Arabidopsis thaliana.. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:585-596[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. Sakamoto, W., Kondo, H., Murata, M., and Motoyoshi, F. (1996) Altered mitochondrial gene expression in a maternal distorted leaf mutant of Arabidopsis induced by chloroplast mutator.. Plant Cell 8:1377-1390[Abstract]. Sandmann, G. (1994) Carotenoid biosynthesis in microorganisms and plants. Eur. J. Biochem. 223:7-24[ISI][Medline]. Sandmann, G., and Albrecht, M. (1990) Accumulation of colorless carotenes and derivatives during interaction of bleaching herbicides with phytoene desaturation. Z. Naturforsch. 45c:487-491. Siedow, J.N., and Umbach, A.L. (1995) Plant mitochondrial electron transfer and molecular biology. Plant Cell 7:821-831[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. Siefermann-Harms, D. (1987) The light-harvesting and protective functions of ca-rotenoids in photosynthetic membranes. Physiol. Plant. 69:561-568. Wetzel, C.M., Jiang, C.-Z., Meehan, L.J., Voytas, D.F., and Rodermel, S.R. (1994) Nuclear-organelle interactions: The immutans variegation mutant of Arabidopsis is plastid autonomous and impaired in carotenoid biosynthesis. Plant J. 6:161-175[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Wu, D., Wright, D.A., Wetzel, C., Voytas, D.F., and Rodermel, S. (1999) The IMMUTANS variegation locus of Arabidopsis defines a mitochondrial alternative oxidase homolog that functions during early chloroplast biogenesis. Plant Cell 11:43-55
Related articles in Plant Cell:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | THE PLANT CELL | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | |
|---|---|---|---|