Plant Cell Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online October 26, 2007; 10.1105/tpc.107.052480

The Plant Cell 19:2988-3000 (2007)
© 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
19/10/2988    most recent
tpc.107.052480v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayama, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coupland, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayama, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coupland, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hayama, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coupland, G.

A Circadian Rhythm Set by Dusk Determines the Expression of FT Homologs and the Short-Day Photoperiodic Flowering Response in Pharbitis[W],[OA]

Ryosuke Hayamaa, Bhavna Agashea, Elisabeth Luleya, Rod Kingb and George Couplanda,1

a Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, D-50829 Cologne, Germany
b Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Plant Industry, Canberra 2601, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

1 Address correspondence to coupland{at}mpiz-koeln.mpg.de.

Seasonal control of flowering through responsiveness to daylength shows extreme variation. Different species flower in response to long days or short days (SDs), and this difference evolved several times. The molecular mechanisms conferring these responses have been compared in detail only in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Oryza sativa) and suggest that a conserved pathway confers daylength responses through regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) transcription by CONSTANS (CO). We studied Pharbitis (Ipomoea nil; formerly, Pharbitis nil), a widely used SD model species and a member of the Convolvulaceae, and showed using transgenic plants together with detailed expression analysis that two putative orthologs of FT (Pn FT1 and Pn FT2) promote flowering specifically under SDs. These genes are expressed only under SDs, and light flashes given during the night reduce their expression and prevent flowering. We demonstrate that in Pharbitis a circadian rhythm set by the light-to-dark transition at dusk regulates Pn FT expression, which rises only when the night is longer than 11 h. Furthermore, Pharbitis accessions that differ in their critical night-length responses express Pn FT at different times after dusk, demonstrating that natural genetic variation influencing the clock regulating Pn FT expression alters the flowering response. In these assays, Pn FT mRNA abundance was not related to Pn CO expression, suggesting that Pn FT may be regulated by a different transcription factor in Pharbitis. We conclude that SD response in Pharbitis is controlled by a dedicated light sensitive clock, set by dusk, that activates Pn FT transcription in darkness, a different mechanism for measuring daylength than described for Arabidopsis and rice.


Related articles in Plant Cell:

Measuring Daylength: Pharbitis Takes a Different Approach
Nancy A. Eckardt
Plant Cell 2007 19: 2968-2969. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
M. Notaguchi, M. Abe, T. Kimura, Y. Daimon, T. Kobayashi, A. Yamaguchi, Y. Tomita, K. Dohi, M. Mori, and T. Araki
Long-Distance, Graft-Transmissible Action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein to Promote Flowering
Plant Cell Physiol., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 1645 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Pouteau, I. Carre, V. Gaudin, V. Ferret, D. Lefebvre, and M. Wilson
Diversification of Photoperiodic Response Patterns in a Collection of Early-Flowering Mutants of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2008; 148(3): 1465 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. W. King, T. Hisamatsu, E. E. Goldschmidt, and C. Blundell
The nature of floral signals in Arabidopsis. I. Photosynthesis and a far-red photoresponse independently regulate flowering by increasing expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)
J. Exp. Bot., October 3, 2008; (2008) ern231v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey
Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2007
J. Exp. Bot., July 18, 2008; (2008) ern109v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. A. Eckardt
Measuring Daylength: Pharbitis Takes a Different Approach
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2007; 19(10): 2968 - 2969.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Plant Biologists